fbpx
Search for:

Balanced-advantage funds: Are they the right choice for regular income?

 

Mr Naresh Gupta, a non-pensioner super senior citizen living in Delhi, recently took out fixed deposits (FDs) to manage his household expenses. However, he needed a regular income and sought our advice on whether to invest in a balanced-advantage fund (as suggested by his friend) for this purpose.

 

What are balanced-advantage funds?

 

  • Balanced-advantage funds, also dynamic asset allocation funds, are a type of hybrid funds that invest in both equity and debt instruments.

 

  • Unlike equity and debt funds that have fixed investment mandates, balanced-advantage funds have a dynamic equity-debt allocation. Broadly speaking, these funds put more money in equities and less in debt when markets are depressed, and vice versa.

 

  • Fund houses claim this dynamic allocation helps them capture potential upsides and limit downsides in volatile equity markets, making them popular among investors.

 

  • However, balanced-advantage funds widely vary in their risk-reward profile. Some funds are vastly conservative, while others can be high on the risk metre.

 

What does this mean for Mr Gupta?

 

  • Given these funds’ wildly differing risk profiles, Mr Gupta must exercise caution while choosing the right balanced-advantage fund.

 

  • For a regular-income portfolio, Mr Gupta can go for a balanced-advantage fund where the equity allocation stays in the range of 40-50 per cent, and doesn’t move to extremes.

 

  • For instance, if a balanced-advantage fund goes aggressive on equity and the market tanks, it can pose a hurdle in deriving regular income. At the same time, a balanced-advantage fund which takes a very conservative call on equities (around 15-20 per cent) may not earn enough returns to support regular income

 

 

That being said, Value Research is sceptical of mutual funds that rely on timing the market. We believe that static equity-debt allocations (such as 75:25, 50:50 and 25:75) based on your ability to take risks work better in the long run. It eliminates the chances of pre-empting market moves based on models or human judgement. Even in the case of funds with dynamic asset allocation, we would prefer the ones that do not take extreme calls. It brings higher predictability.

 

An alternate route

Mr Gupta can also follow the below alternate strategy:

 

  • Invest at least one-third of the money in equities at all times, preferably in good flexi-cap funds or large-cap funds (for very conservative investors) to achieve returns that beat inflation.

 

  • Invest the other two-thirds of the money in fixed-income investment avenues, such as government-backed guaranteed return schemes like the Senior Citizen Savings Scheme (SCSS). Also, allocate some of the funds to high-quality short-duration funds for emergencies.

 

  • Rebalance the portfolio every year and limit annual withdrawal to no more than 5-6 per cent of the corpus.

 

Source- Valueresearchonline

Should I allocate over half of my portfolio to small and mid-cap funds?

 

Is it advisable to build a core equity portfolio (50-60 per cent) in mid and small caps, considering an SIP tenure for 10 plus years? – Anonymous

 

When it comes to long-term investing, a time horizon of 10 years or more is well-suited for equity investments. However, it’s important to avoid over-concentrating in one type of fund or solely investing in mid and small-cap funds. For example, building a core equity portfolio where 50-60 per cent is allocated to mid and small-cap funds is not recommended.

 

Instead, a diversified approach to equity via flexi-cap funds is recommended, as they invest across large, mid, and small-cap stocks. By investing in a flexi-cap fund, around 25-30 per cent of your portfolio is exposed to mid and small-cap stocks, while large-caps make up about 70 per cent. When building a portfolio, it’s best to focus on stocks that provide growth with stability, which large-caps tend to offer. Riskier assets should only be allocated a small portion of the portfolio.

 

While mid and small-cap funds may provide higher returns than flexi-cap funds in the long run, they may fluctuate more in the short run and are generally considered riskier. Having a higher exposure of 50-60 per cent to mid and small-cap funds can make your portfolio much more volatile, which is not advisable.

 

In conclusion, if you’re willing to accept higher risk and volatility for higher returns, you can add a mid or small-cap fund along with a flexi-cap fund. This way your portfolio allocation to mid- and small-caps would be slightly higher. However, it’s not advisable to make them the core of your portfolio.

 

Source- Valueresearchonline

Direct plan platforms to charge a flat transaction fee either from AMCs or investors

 

Execution Only Platforms (EOPs) will become reality by September 1, 2023. In a circular, SEBI has introduced the concept of EOPs, which essentially says that digital platforms offering direct plans free of cost will now have to charge a flat transaction fee either from AMCs or directly from investors.

 

SEBI has introduced two set of norms of EOPs – category 1 EOPs can become agent of AMCs and charge transaction fee from them by obtaining license from AMFI and category 2 EOPs can become representative of investors and charge them directly by taking stock broking license.

 

SEBI has defined EOP as any digital or online platform, which facilitates transactions such as subscription, redemption and switch transactions in direct plans of the schemes of mutual funds.

 

All players who are into distribution of direct plan will have to obtain EOP license by December 01, 2023. Also, industry platforms like MF Central, MF Utilities, BSE Star MF and NSE NMF II will also have to obtain EOP license.

 

Further, the market regulator has clarified that platforms provided by SEBI RIAs and stock brokers to their advisory or broking clients are not covered under EOP framework.

 

Let us look at the other key details of the new regulation on this new distribution channel:

 

  • While Category 1 EOPs will have to obtain license from AMFI, category 2 EOPs will have to get stock broking license under SEBI (Stock Brokers) Regulations

 

  • Category 1 EOPs will act agent of AMCs whereas category 2 EOPs will act as agent of investor

 

  • EOPs will have to facilitate non-financial transaction like change of email id or phone number, bank account and so on

 

  • They cannot deal in regular plans of mutual funds

 

  • Category 1 EOPs can provide their services to other intermediaries

 

  • Category 1 EOPs will have to abide by AMFI norms to onboard clients. AMCs will be held responsible for carrying out KYC of investors coming through this channel

 

  • Category 2 EOPs will have to comply with KYC norms to onboard new clients. Further, they should have access to KYC data through KRAs

 

  • Both category 1 and 2 EOPs can charge transaction fee from AMCs and investors, respectively subject to upper limit capped by AMFI and stock exchange

 

  • AMCs cannot adjust such a fee with the scheme i.e. they cannot charge it to the scheme

 

  • Both EOPs will have to ensure comprehensive risk management, access control and prevent unauthorised access

 

  • EOPs will have to ensure all transaction are dealt in a fair and non-discriminatory manner

 

  • EOPs will have to formulate data protection policy, ensure data privacy and confidentiality and maintain all data

 

  • Entity will have to maintain arm’s length relationship with clients to avoid conflict of interest if performing multiple activities

 

  • If such an entity is into MF distribution at group level, they will have to ensure family level segregation between direct and regular business

 

  • Category 1 EOPs will have to route transaction directly through AMCs or respective RTAs whereas category 2 EOPs can route MF transaction through stock exchange platforms

 

  • Both EOPs cannot display advertisement of MF scheme or brand

 

  • Pooling of funds will not be allowed

 

  • EOP will have to disclose – name of MF scheme, name of fund manager, investment objective, scheme performance, scheme details, risk-o-meter among other things

 

  • EOP cannot list products based on ratings or rankings

 

 

Source- Cafemutual

Is it good to have four mutual funds in your portfolio?

 

You recommend four or five funds for a portfolio. Does it include both debt fund and equity fund or does it depend on the amount invested or you refer four or five equity funds only? – Hemant Bhatt

 

There is no rigid rule to recommend a certain number of funds. Also, there is no one scientifically derived precise number of funds that one can have. The rationale for investing in more funds is to diversify. This helps in offsetting the risk of some of the investments turning bad or performing poorly.

 

But there is no merit in continuing to add more funds in your portfolio beyond a certain point when you don’t get much benefit out of diversification.

 

How much is too much?

Four or five funds are good enough for diversification. This is as per an elaborate study which we did sometime back. The study suggested that beyond four or five funds, typically in the case of equity, you don’t get any meaningful benefit out of diversification in terms of reduced volatility.

 

Having said that, we’d suggest that you think of this aspect from the lens of your goals. As long as you have reasonable diversity in the number of funds for different goals, it is good enough.

 

Let’s understand with an example

Let’s say a person has three different goals to be achieved in the next one year, next two-three years and next 15 years. Such goals with different time frames would require a very different set of investments. Therefore if this person has 10-12 funds, they may not be too many considering all the three goals.

 

In contrast, if someone has three different goals, all to be achieved over the long term, say, in the next five years (single time frame), then a portfolio of more than 10 funds would be too many.

 

In conclusion
Your goal will have an important role to play in determining the number of funds that are good enough for your portfolio. So, have a goal-based investing mindset, and you’ll probably be able to make a better sense of diversification.

 

Source- Valueresearchonline

How to move your corpus to an equity fund?

 

Hi, I am 40 years old and my PPF maturity of around Rs 15 lakh is due next year. I want to move to a better growth investment instrument like NPS wherein I am ready to stay invested for another 15-20 years. I am aware that my withdrawals from PPF will be tax free. Can you please suggest the strategy to systematically move my investment into these equity funds? – Suchit Poothia

 

You need to keep a few things in mind when you want to move your corpus to equity funds.

 

  • Duration: The thumb rule to decide the duration of your equity investment when you have a lump sum is to spread the investment across half the period it took you to earn that money, but it shouldn’t be more than three years. For instance, if it took you five years to build a corpus of Rs 30 lakh, then you can divide the corpus and spread the new investment across 12 to 24 months. This staggering approach to investing will help reduce the cost of investment as well as the risk.
  •  

  • Allocating to equity: Since the time horizon for your new investment is about 15 to 20 years, you should look at allocating more in equity. This is because they tend to beat inflation in the long-run.

 

Now if you wish to use the current corpus to invest in your NPS account, select the active choice option and allocate 75 per cent to equities. But do keep in mind the withdrawal restriction.

 

You can withdraw only up to 60 per cent of the NPS corpus as a lump sum when you reach the age of 60 and the remaining 40 per cent has to be used to purchase annuities. Partial NPS withdrawal is allowed only under certain special circumstances such as to meet medical expenses, education and marriage expenses of children, etc.

 

Other investment options

Alternatively, if you are a disciplined investor and won’t touch the corpus until retirement, then you can invest in flexi-cap funds. These are pure equity funds and have no restrictions on withdrawals. Unlike the NPS which mostly invests in large-cap stocks, flexi-cap funds diversify their investments in mid and small caps too. This can provide you slightly better returns.

 

However, if you have never invested in equities before and are wary of allocating 100 per cent to equity, you can choose an aggressive hybrid fund. These funds invest about 65 per cent in equities and 35 per cent in debt. This mixture helps to contain the equity volatility and is better placed to provide more consistent returns as compared to pure equity funds.

 

Softening the risk is what is necessary for new investors so that you are psychologically strong to stay the course and do not end up exiting the fund in panic.

 

Source- Valueresearchonline

How to manage asset allocation during the accumulation phase?

 

I am 32 years old. I have been investing in mutual funds and shares since the last five years. But my question is how should I manage asset allocation during this accumulation phase, or to be specific when should I sell out part of the equity investment and move it to debt? – Anonymous

 

Great to know that you started investing early. Investing early has several benefits.

 

Asset allocation is a critical aspect of investing. It involves distributing equity and fixed-income assets in your portfolio, based on your investment horizon, risk tolerance, and investment goals.

 

Equity allocation based on investment horizon

As a general guideline, your equity allocation should increase with a more extended investment horizon. Equities have the potential to offer higher inflation-adjusted returns than other asset classes over time. However, as you approach the time when you need your funds, you should reduce your equity allocation in your portfolio and allocate more to debt.

 

If your financial goals are approximately three years away, investing solely in debt/fixed-income instruments is advisable. For goals that are further than three years away, you may choose to allocate a portion of your portfolio to equities.

 

Allocation guidelines for specific financial goals

For goals that are three to five years away, allocating around 25-30 per cent in equities is preferable. If your goals are five to seven years away, you may allocate 30-50 per cent, or even higher, in equities, depending on your risk tolerance. For goals that are seven or more years away, you may allocate even a higher portion to equities (70-80 per cent) and the remainder to debt or fixed income.

 

Systematic investment and exit

Additionally, since it is advisable to invest systematically via SIPs, it is equally important to exit in a systematic manner through an STP or SWP. For example, if your long-term goal is only three years away, consider transferring from equity to debt in a staggered manner instead of doing so all at once. This approach can assist you in avoiding market volatility and ensuring a smooth investment experience.

 

In conclusion, managing asset allocation during the accumulation phase necessitates a thorough understanding of your investment horizon, risk tolerance, and investment goals. By making informed decisions and following a systematic approach, you can create a well-diversified portfolio that can help you achieve your financial goals.

 

Source- Valueresearchonline

Invest lump sum in aggressive hybrid funds?

 

“Can I invest a lump sum of Rs 10 lakh in an aggressive hybrid fund, since it is not a pure equity fund?”, asked one of our readers.

 

Investors often ask this question because they co-relate the importance of SIP and the averaging cost of purchase with equity funds alone. However, it is equally important to not invest a lump sum in equity or equity-oriented funds. For instance, in aggressive hybrid funds. To understand why, let us quickly look at how aggressive hybrid funds work in the first place.

 

Aggressive hybrid funds or equity-oriented hybrid mutual funds

An aggressive hybrid fund invests in both equity and debt securities. However, their allocation in equity and related instruments is higher (65-80 per cent) than in debt instruments. In other words, they can even be called equity-oriented funds.

 

Theoretically, the equity-debt combination helps them balance high returns and stability. However, because of their higher asset allocation in equity, they are subject to volatility and market risks.

 

Understanding the impact of market on aggressive hybrid funds

 

For instance, this graph illustrates the ten worst one-year rolling returns of the Sensex index and aggressive hybrid Funds. There are two things to notice here.

 

Firstly, it is evident that aggressive hybrid funds, despite being equity-oriented, have weathered the equity market downturn better due to their debt component. This aspect provides a protective cushion, resulting in smaller losses compared to pure equity funds, like the sensex index fund for instance.

 

More importantly, this graph indicates how a lump sum investment can suffer from massive losses if it experiences a market fall. In this scenario, if you had invested a lump sum of Rs 1 lakh just a year before March 2020, you would have suffered a 21 per cent loss over the year, leaving you with just Rs 79,000. This is why investing the entire sum at once doesn’t make sense.

 

The alternative

This is where SIPs step in.

 

They have the ability to shield your investments from short-term market fluctuations and thus protect you from risk. SIPs ensure that you do not invest a significant sum during a market high and then suffer from a subsequent fall.

 

When you invest through an SIP, it allows you to invest only a portion of your money, albeit on a regular basis, irrespective of the market conditions. As a result, when market prices are high, fewer units are purchased, and when prices are low, more units are bought.

 

In the longer run, your investment ends up with an average purchase cost, thus reaping the benefits of a disciplined approach to investing. This is commonly known as ‘rupee cost averaging’.

 

The timeline

Now you know you shouldn’t invest a large sum of money, all at once. Instead you should opt for an SIP.

 

The only question is – how much time should you take to invest this money?

 

An efficient way of calculating your investment timeline is to calculate the time it took you to accumulate these funds. Ideally, you should invest this money in half that time.

 

However, it is recommended that you invest this money in not more than three years.

 

Three years is a good time to go through an entire market cycle, and capture both the market rise and fall.

 

Beyond this timeline, there isn’t any real advantage to staggering your investment. In fact, a major downside to a longer timeline is that you may be tempted to spend this money.

 

Our take

Do not invest a large sum all at once. Instead, always plan an SIP.

 

To calculate the timeline for your SIPs, consider the following:

  • How large is this sum?
  • How important and valuable is this money for you?
  • How much time, effort, and energy went into accumulating it?
  • Invest the money over a shorter duration if you have a higher income.
  • Or, if your risk appetite is low, invest this money over a slightly extended period.

Do not take more than three years to invest your lump sum.

 

The key to your wealth, dear reader, is always in disciplined investing!

 

Source- Valueresearchonline

How expense ratio eats into your mutual fund gains

 

We recently received a question from one of our readers (we urge all of you to share your names) asking how mutual fund houses charge expense ratios.

 

Before we answer that question, let’s understand what expense ratio is and how it impacts your mutual fund investments.

 

What is expense ratio

 

In simple words, it’s an annual fee that fund houses charge their investors. It consists of their annual operating costs, which include management fees, administration fees and even advertising and promotion expenses, among others.

 

It is important to note that while the expense ratio is an annual fee, it is not charged once every year. Instead, it is subtly deducted daily from the fund’s net asset value (NAV) .

 

Since the expense ratio is an intrinsic expense, which is automatically deducted from the NAV, you don’t get any receipt on it.

 

This fee is charged irrespective of the fund’s positive or negative performance.

 

How expense ratio applies to your investments

 

Let’s see an example. Suppose you invest Rs 50,000 in a flexi-cap fund and the holding period is one year.

 

As with any other investment, there are certain charges applicable. One of them is the Securities Transaction Tax (STT), a direct tax payable on the purchase or sale of securities.

 

Let’s assume the STT to be 0.005 per cent.

 

This means the total investment amount going into the flexi-cap fund will not be Rs 50,000 but Rs 49,997.5 (Rs 50,000 – Rs 2.5).

 

Next, let’s say the expense ratio is 1.5 per cent.

 

If you invest your money for exactly 12 months, you will be charged the 1.5 per cent expense fee.

 

But if you remain invested for, say, nine months, you will be charged on a pro-rata basis for 273 days instead of 365. In this case, you’d have to cough out an expense ratio of 1.125 per cent.

 

How expense ratio affects your investment

Essentially, after accounting for the expense ratio, the actual gain from the investment over the course of the year is not 10 per cent but 8.35 per cent.

 

Things to keep in mind

  • While the daily deduction is small, the expense ratio incrementally reduces your returns.
  • While choosing a fund with a lower expense ratio may be tempting, it should not be the only factor while selecting a fund.
  • Instead, you should also consider the fund’s five-, 10-year returns, the experience of the fund manager, and how well the scheme aligns with your risk tolerance and investment goals.

 

Source- Valueresearchonline